Linking Aristotle’s virtue with character Essay

Aristotles fairness ethics is often considered to be instituteed on constituent such that an various(prenominal)s disposition defines his or her equitys. It is important to denounce that Aristotle gives emphasis to the intellection that merit is acquired through habit. In this regard, it can be presumed that there is a connection betwixt character and virtue in the context of Aristotles philosophy. This is especially interesting to look into incisively because charitable beings think and act at least in terms of hotshots consciousness or idea of ethics, specifically through mavins moral precepts.If it is indeed true that individuals think and act in ways related to ones moral inclinations in their free-and-easy lives, then it is a strong reason to contend that virtue and character are all the much important elements in the life of humanity. The depict that I would like to raiseand agree with Aristotleis the idea that our habits, the way in which we do things on a reg ular basis, form a bragging(a) sumif not allof our character. And since character builds our very virtues, it can be presumed that the things that we do on a regular basis define our virtues.That is, if we prevent to harbor the bad or evil elements in the society, then it is or so likely the case that our character develops into something bad or evil. In the end, there will be little or no means for us to acquire virtues. The task of this assignment is to identify what is the connection in the midst of character and virtue in the context of Aristotle by providing Aristotles explanation of how we acquire virtues and why choice is an important component of these virtues.In the throw III of Aristotles Nichomachean Ethics, I found out that one base notion in Aristotelian ethics that occupies a key signification is Aristotles belief in the role of mans activities in order for one to acquire ethical acquaintance. That is, for one to become virtuous or to obtain virtues one sho uld not immaculately confine himself to mere studying of these virtues but rather one should, more importantly, actualize this association of the virtues. Thus, for one to become good, one should do good. I also found out in the same work of Aristotle the doctrine of the mean.The substance of this doctrine dwells on the basic precept that one ought to avoid the extremes and, instead, drop for the mean. The actions of men, more specifically, ought to be framed upon the mean which is the virtue. For example, the virtue of bravery rests on the mean between two extremes cowardice or the escape of courage, and rashness or the excess in courage. All of these things answer the central question being asked, specifically the identification of the connection between virtue and character.For the most part, the thought of the acquisition of virtue requires a form of a good act which, when constantly repeated or enacted on a regular basis, forms the character of the individual. The individ ual should not only be given over towards a theoretical understanding of these good acts but should also be inclined to en acting them, of living them on purpose and free will. It is not comme il faut that the individual should simply live the theoretical perspectives of doing good acts for it does not come to forming the character of the individual.Moreover, these good acts are founded on the principle of the mean wherein the individual is supposed to be acting not within the extremes but between these extremes because they are the evils. Hence, character is connected to virtue through ones goodor middleactions performed habitually. I figured out that Aristotle implies the idea that man is indeed a social being in the awareness that one cannot sufficiently do good without the presence of former(a) pot.That is, without otherwise battalion to whom our good deeds will be enacted to, our actions whitethorn scarce be conceived as good in the first place precisely because we ma y only be helpful if there are people to help, we may only be kind if there are people to whom we will be kind, or we may only be gentle if there are other people to love just to hear a few. Of course, my thoughts may be unacceptable to other people for they may also afford their own thoughts about the ethics of Aristotle.But more to this, I figured out that those people who surround us have a large role in the formation of our character. Social isolation does not give room for the moral development of an individual. On the other hand, I have arrived at a question concerning Aristotles virtue ethics, especially with his doctrine of the mean. Exactly how are we to know when we are acting in the middle such that we avert from the extremes or the vices? Granted that we may be able to identify the vices that we should avoid, when can we say that we are genuinely in the middle path?How can too much knowledge be a vice or an evil when Aristotle gives a satisfying account and importa nce to knowledge? While there may liquid a handful of questions that may have been left untouched, it can hardly be doubted that our actions share a significant role in specify our characters as human beings. Whether or not an individual believes in virtue ethics or in morality in general, it remains a fact that our actions have consequences to us and to other people.ReferenceAristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Martin Ostwald. New tee shirt Prentice Hall, 1962.