Sample Reactions Paper

Sample reading Reaction Paper The question on page 4 of milling machine is really interesting if you had a grant where would you go to conduct anthropological question and what would it be about? I remember sound offing as an undergrad what I would do if I stepped of a plane in some county. How would I til now pick the county? Can you pick whatsoever country? Do you decide on a place first, and and then what you will research, or is it the other way around? I got to resolvent many of these questions in my training, but did non fully put it unitedly till I did field deed.I also learned there is no adept answer to how, when, and where fieldwork is conducted. So many factors go into the process, there simply can non be a universal fit for anthropologists. The summary of the four subfields of anthropology is pretty perceptive and clear. Someone in class brought up whether the Garbage Project (or garbology as its often called) is really worthwhile. I confess I think statically data can tell us most of this. Further, with the limited shape of resources available to archaeological I question if its a just use of time and money.What about ancient civilizations and historically important sites we let not explored? However, a recent article in the New York multiplication Book Review made some insights I felt were relevant to this topic. Discussing literary criticism, the author said that the important part of academic research was that often the value of something was not obvious until much later on. Something that does not find a lot of relevance today may be profoundly relevant down the road. Perhaps garbage archaeology is such a field.Also, a piece I heard on NPR, with the anthropologist-in-residence with the New York sanitisation department, addressed the topic in a way I had not considered. The anthropologist was quite persuasive in the importance of understanding sanitation, its roll in modern society, and why some reflexivity on the matter is va luable. nonpareil of her major projects has been to set up a museum, which will house municipal documents on sanitation, including things like street sweeping, for the city. Given these two things, I skill give garbology a little more leeway than I at one time did.I was pleased by the section Miller included on use anthropology, a subject we cover in great detail later on, as I aroma it is very important. The reference to Paul husbandman, in a dialog box set apart from the rest of the text, is excellent. Farmer is an anthropologist whose work I did not be get hold familiar with till alumnus school. However, once I read his books I have been perpetually strike by his style of anthropology. Farmer is both a medical touch on and an anthropologist.He does not just go study people in faraway places he goes to make their lives better. His passion and advocacy should serve as a guide for our whole field. Farmers honesty about the work we do, and the obligations we should have to t he people we did research with, is not something I have come across in many places. Tracy Kidders book on Farmer, Mountains beyond Mountains, is a wonderful read. But Famers own books are even more powerful, if a little more academic. I do feel some things get rushed in the first chapter.The section on the history of anthropology is very brief. While this is not a book, or a class for that matter, on the history of anthropological theory and method, a just development of the topic is instructive. The ideas we have today are distilled from ideas that we had in the past. brain that we have refined, and even abandoned some, ideas demonstrates the place of anthropology in the world. Plus, you do not need to reinvent the wheel. And, to carry the metaphor further, some wheels do not work. We look at past ideas so we can move on from them.