Maslow’s theory Essay

There is an interrelationship between Maslows theory and Herzbergs theory. These two theories have a similarity in that both of them suggest employee satisfaction as a demand chemical element. get the above discussion, it is possible to tell that Herzberg cites esteem postulate and self-actualization take ins from Maslows theory as the motivators. Others ineluctably do not cause motivation and failure to address them in the organization pose only leads to dissatisfaction. Criticisms Maslows theory Several criticisms exist about Maslows motivation theory.To start up with, there is limited scientific evidence if any to support the above theory. Furthermore, personal need priorities may not be in the aver given by Maslow. For example, there is a possibility of social needs coming before security needs since one must kick the bucket to a society in the first place. An other(a) criticism is that stack do not necessarily satisfy each level of need at a time. Needs tend to confl ict such that a person may be motivated to achieve different needs at the same time or make priorities depending on the prodding of each need.Maslows theory is therefore general and does not admit one-on-one differences. Herzbergs theory Herzbergs theory does not excessively consider individual differences when analyzing factors that cause satisfaction and those that cause dissatisfaction. One dissatisfaction factor may be a motivator for someone else and vise versa. For example, cast up responsibility could be a dissatisfier for someone who is resistant to change. Again Hertzbers model is too simplistic and only addresses factors that people would consider regulation motivational factors in any workplace setting.Describe goal setting theory. Explain how this theory can be applied to performance judgment and compensation This is a motivational theory developed by Edwin Locke. It is really an improvement of the final causality theory advanced by Aristotle which position for th that purpose can lead to action. According to Locke, an individuals behavior is to a large extent influenced by their ambitions and goals (Latham and Locke, 2002). For this reason, goals significantly improve performance. Most individuals set goals in anticipation for something usually a refund to be obtained after achieving the set goal.Goals can be said to extend to performance in three different flairs (Latham and Locke, 2002). Firstly, they narrow an individuals attention so that all efforts be directed towards activities that are relevant to achieving the set goals. Similarly, irrelevant or undesirable activities are avoided. Secondly, goals increase effort as individuals strive to achieve the set goal so as to gain the expected reward. Thirdly, goals help individuals to develop persistence. In other words, they become more willing to work even in the center of scraps and setbacks.Goal setting is guided by factors known as moderators (Latham and Locke, 2002). These ac commodate goal commitment, attainability and self-efficacy. In order to attain a received goal, an individual must be ready to face every challenge that he or she finds on the way. Commitment depicts the need to achieve no matter what the circumstances. Set goals must also be attainable so that individuals must not set goals that cannot be reached. Finally, self-efficacy must be bring out for goals to be achieved. This refers to the ability to act in a certain way so as to be able to achieve set objectives.